Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00889
Original file (PD2012 00889.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME:    CASE: PD1200889
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20130514
SEPARATION DATE: 20030508


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (95B/Military Policeman) medically separated for low back pain (LBP). The CI first injured his back in 2000 when he fell while rappelling in Germany; he again exacerbated the condition in 2001 while shoveling snow. Conservative treatment was ineffective and surgery was deemed to not be an option. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or physical fitness standards so he was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The back condition, characterized as “degenerative disc disease with HNP at L5-S1” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also identified and forwarded two other conditions (see rating chart below) for PEB adjudication. The PEB adjudicated “low back pain…” as unfitting and rated 10%. The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting . The CI made no appeals and was medically separated with that disability rating.


CI CONTENTION: “I am able to manage my back pain through a good diet & exercise. However over the last couple of years the exercising has become more difficult due back pain & soreness.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting LBP is addressed below. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review remain eligible for future consideration by respective the Service Board for Correction of Military Records.


RATING COMPARISON:

Service PEB – Dated 20030306
 VA - (1 Mos Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Low Back Pain with DDD
 5299-5295 10% DDD with HNP 5295 10% 20030403
Left Sided HF Hearing Loss w/ Tinnitus
 Not Unfitting Tinnitus, Left Ear 6260 10% 20020909
Hearing Loss, Left Ear 6100 0%
White Matter on Brain MRI
 Scattered Spots…Brain 8099-8046 0% STR
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x 1
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 20%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 20030521 .



ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Low Back Pain. The narrative summary (NARSUM) notes the CI experienced a fall from approximately twelve feet and injured his back, resulting in LBP and stiffness with intermittent left leg pain; this injury was exacerbated in December 2001 while shoveling snow. Lumbar X-rays were normal without evidence of fracture, subluxation, or degenerative changes. Lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 5 January 2002 showed mild to moderate degenerative disc disease (DDD) and a central disc herniation without nerve compression. The orthopedic surgeon did not recommend surgery and despite 6 months of conservative treatment the CI was unable to return to full duty. At the MEB exam 30 December 2002, approximately 4 months prior to separation, the CI reported sharp pain on the left side of his low back with occasional numbness and pain down his left leg. He reported not being able to run or do sit ups without exacerbating his back condition. The MEB physical exam noted tenderness to palpation of the lumbar muscles with some palpable spasm. There was full range-of-motion (ROM) of the L-spine noted and the CI was able to touch his toes, albeit with some pain. There was normal strength, sensation and reflexes of both lower extremities. The NARSUM noted that a neurological evaluation 9 December 2002, primarily performed for another matter, noted normal muscle strength and reflexes, normal sensation of both lower extremities with the exception of a mild decrease sensation near the left big toe. The CI’s gait was normal and he was able to heel, toe and tandem walk without difficulty. At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam 3 April 2003, approximately a month prior to separation, the CI reported painful motion of his low back with muscle spasm. The VA exam showed a normal gait and station. Lumbar ROM was flexion of 90 degrees (Normal). No painful motion or muscle spasm was noted. Reflexes were normal and straight leg raise (SLR) was negative bilaterally.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the LBP condition as 5299-5295 (analogous to lumbosacral strain) at 10% and the VA rated as 5295 (lumbosacral strain) at 10%. The Board is required to provide a disability rating in accordance with VA rating guidelines in effect at the time of separation and the Board endeavored to fulfill this obligation. The CI was placed on quarters for a day in January 2002; there was no additional evidence in the record of incapacitating episodes due to the low back. At the MEB exam, approximately 4 months prior to separation, the CI was noted to have full ROM with some pain and muscle spasm noted. At the C&P exam, approximately a month prior to separation, the CI was noted to have a normal lumbar spine exam, without painful motion or muscle spasm noted. The Board agreed that the CI’s LBP condition at permanent separation most nearly met the 10% rating of 5295. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the LBP condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the LBP condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.



RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Low Back Pain Condition
 5299-5295 10%
COMBINED
 10%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 2012, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record





         Physical Disability Board of Review


 SFMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB),

SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for AR20130010951 (PD201200889)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                 
                                                      (Army Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01933

    Original file (PD2012 01933.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEB adjudicated lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) as unfitting and rated 10% with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board must recommend a disability rating in accordance with VA rating guidelines in effect on the date of the CI’s separation and the Board did so. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01615

    Original file (PD2012 01615.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, the Board cannot support a recommendation for additional rating based on peripheral nerve impairment.After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% for the LBP condition coded as 5299-5295. Physical Disability Board of Review I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00078

    Original file (PD2013 00078.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was evaluated for reported symptoms of paresthesias of the right upper extremity, but cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on 9 January 2001 did not show spinal canal stenosis or nerve encroachment and nerve conduction studies on 13 April 2001 did not show any evidence of radicuolpathy.The CI was involved in another MVA on 26 June 2001 and was seen in the ER for “right shoulder, neck and low back pain;” the exam noted only right trapezius muscle tenderness, no spinal tenderness,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01343

    Original file (PD2012 01343.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated chronic LBP secondary to DDDL4-L5, L5-S1 without radiculopathy or chronic musclespasmasunfitting, rated 10%with likely application of the Veterans’ Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The other condition was determined to be not unfitting and therefore not ratable.The CI made no appeals, and was medically separatedwith a 10% disability rating. Based on a thorough review of the evidence in the service treatment record (STR), the Board...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01840

    Original file (PD-2013-01840.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    invalid font number 31502 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the low back pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01058

    Original file (PD2012-01058.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    IAW DoDI 6040.44, this Board must consider the appropriate rating for the CI’s back condition at separation based on the VASRD standards in effect at that time. An outpatient examination on 21 November 2001 (7 months prior to separation) documented a negative straight leg raise (SLR) test and normal muscle strength, sensation and DTRs. At a later C&P exam on 23 June 2003 (a year after separation), the CI reported constant low back dull, aching pain.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00933

    Original file (PD2012 00933.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating determinations for disability at the time of separation. Chronic Low Back Pain .The narrative summary (NARSUM) notes the CI sustained a lifting injury in March 2001 causing severe low back pain (LBP). The Board must apply the VASRD rating criteria in effect on the date of the CI’s separation and the Board did...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01587

    Original file (PD 2012 01587.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD1201587 BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY BOARD DATE: 20130411 SEPARATION DATE: 20020903 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4(74B/COMPUTER SPECIALIST) medically separated for a lumbar spine condition due to lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD). ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01279

    Original file (PD 2012 01279.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. RATING COMPARISON: Service Admin IPEB – Dated 20021212 VA - (6 days Post-Separation) Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Chronic Low Back Pain 5295 10% S/P Laminectomy and Diskectomy L-5, S1 w/DDD 5292 40%* 20030609 LLE Radiculopathy Associated w/ S/P Laminectomy and Diskectomy L-5, S1 w/DDD 8599-8520 10% 20030609 Mild High Frequency Hearing loss Not Unfitting Bilateral High Frequency Hearing Loss Not Service...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00808

    Original file (PD2012 00808.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB forwarded chronic back pain and chronic neck pain as medically unacceptablefor Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication IAW AR 40-501.The PEB adjudicated the “chronic pain, neck and LBP, without neurologic abnormality” as unfitting, rated together as 10% with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. In the matter of the “unbundled” chronic neck pain condition, the Board unanimously agrees it was not separately unfitting and that it cannot...